Response to “101 reasons why Linux is better than Windows” – Part 2

This is a response (Part 2) to the web blog entitled “101 reasons why Linux is better than Windows”(http://cityblogger.com/archives/2007/01/24/101-reasons-why-linux-is-better-than-windows/)”. The author tries to discredit Windows by giving many reasons why Linux is “better”.

I will do my best to show how this is not the case. Operating systems are just tools. If you try to make one OS look “better” than another, you could possibly lead people into the wrong direction. Please note that the author has not written all 101 reasons on his blog. It appears he stopped writing it a while back. I will respond to everything he has currently written.

Direct quotes from the author are in red and my responses are in black.  Please note that I mean no disrespect to the author in anything I say.

Click here for Part 1!

Click here for Part 3!

———————

11) Linux also doesn’t require rebooting when you install a new application.

Around 99% of all the Windows software I use, I can install without having to reboot Windows. In other words, Windows and Linux are about the same in this area.

12) Linux doesn’t require frequent rebooting. Linux runs extremely stable, even if an application crashes, there is no need to reboot the whole system, just restart that application or service.

The same applies to a correctly setup Windows install.

13) Most importantly Linux doesn’t reboot on its own! I have had a situation where Windows updated the system and then rebooted on its own, without my knowledge. And worst, this was when I was updating my digital camera firmware.

Then just turn off your automatic Windows updates. This is not a problem with Windows. This is a problem with the way the user has configured Windows.

14) No licensing headaches: Yes Linux is free and you don’t know need to bother about the complexing licensing of per user/per PC/per server/etc. Note: Some Linux distributions charge a yearly subscription to get the updates and patches, however this is still more simpler than the proprietary world.

A person who goes to the store and buys a laptop (or desktop) will already have Windows preinstalled and activated.

Companies who use Windows (desktop and server editions) should already have people who are familiar with licensing Windows and act accordingly to the company’s needs.

15) Linux can read over a 100 different types of file systems. Windows is limited to its own two file systems. Well most general users may not care about this but its extremely useful is you are working in a mixed environment or you need to extract some data from a hard drive formatted on another computer.

That statement is incorrect. Windows is capable of reading from various file systems, not just its native ones. (Look here: Ext2Fsd  and here:  http://www.paragon-software.com/home/extfs-windows/)

You just need a driver to allow you to read another file-system on Windows. Same applies to Linux. Windows is not limited to just two file-systems.

16) You have access to the source code and the right to modify or fix things if you are a programmer. Many end users think this is not necessary but they will realize how important this is when their application vendor decides to discontinue support on a older version to promote a newer one.

Most average computer users will not know how (nor care) to modify source code. Linux is only ‘freedom’ to people who know how to modify it and use it (e.g., computer programmers). If you are a casual computer user, Linux would not really give you any more freedom than Windows would.

17) Linux can install in logical partition or a second (slave hard drive as well)Windows can only be installed in a primary partition. Read this on some suggestions for partitioning.

You can install Windows on a separate partition from the “primary” one.

18) Linux is scalable right from the PDA/Cellphones to super computers.

Windows works on cell phones (called: Windows Phone). Windows is used in supercomputers, but it has a very small usage share. Linux is chosen over Windows for supercomputers due to being free and due to companies being able to modify its source code.

19) Linux is running mission critical applications including powering an Aircraft.

So does Windows. There are hospitals that use Windows (Look here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windows-embedded/archive/2013/04/30/windows-embedded-8-is-great-for-healthcare.aspx)

20) Linux has less bugs than commercial software, this is one of the main reasons for its stability. Read more.

How do you know? You didn’t give any proof for your claim.

———————

Well this is the end of Part 2!  Click here for Part 3!

Click here for Part 1!


Posted in Internet and Servers, Operating Systems

Response to “101 reasons why Linux is better than Windows” – Part 1

This is a response (Part 1) to the web blog entitled “101 reasons why Linux is better than Windows”(http://cityblogger.com/archives/2007/01/24/101-reasons-why-linux-is-better-than-windows/)”. The author tries to discredit Windows by giving many reasons why Linux is “better”.

I will do my best to show how this is not the case. Operating systems are just tools. If you try to make one OS look “better” than another, you could possibly lead people into the wrong direction. Please note that the author has not written all 101 reasons on his blog. It appears he stopped writing it a while back. I will respond to everything he has currently written.

Direct quotes from the author are in red and my responses are in black.  Please note that I mean no disrespect to the author in anything I say.

Click here for Part 2!

———————

1) It works :) Its not a vaporware and is available today.

Windows is also not vaporware and is most certainly available today as well.

2) Linux doesn’t have the virus problems: Even Microsoft’s CEO Steve Balmer couldn’t clean Windows Viruses. Still not convinced? Read more on Why Linux isn’t affected by Viruses. Its not that there aren’t any viruses for Linux but Linux is more secure and less virus prone.

While Linux is often perceived as being immune to malware, it’s not entirely true. Malware can exist on Linux, but it’s relatively rare. Similarly, a properly configured Windows computer can also be resistant to malware. The likelihood of getting malware on either platform largely depends on user behavior. By exercising common sense, users can significantly reduce the risk of malware infection, with over 97% of malware threats being avoidable.

It’s also worth noting that simply being connected to the internet does not significantly increase the risk of catching a virus, regardless of whether you’re using Windows or Linux.

3) No Spyware: Not just spyware but none of those funny applications that keep doing things in the background.

This is definitely false. Look here: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do

4) Linux Doesn’t need defragging: The Linux file systems work very efficiently such that it arranges data in a way that it doesn’t require defragging. to know more, read earlier post.

It’s a common misconception that a file system can be completely free of fragmentation. In reality, every file system, regardless of its type (such as NTFS, ext4, or FAT32), is susceptible to fragmentation. This occurs when files are deleted, leaving behind gaps in the file system that are later filled by other files. As a result, files can become scattered throughout the file system, forcing the computer to search through multiple locations on the drive.

5) Linux doesn’t crash without any apparent reasons. In Linux the core operating system (kernel) is separate from the GUl (X-Window) from the applications (OpenOffice.org, etc). So even if the application crashes, the core operating system is not affected. In Windows (Microsoft prefers to call this tight integration) if the Browser crashes, it can take down the entire operating system.

The Windows and Linux kernels operate independently of the primary applications and processes that run on top of them, such as explorer.exe on Windows or the X11 windowing system on Linux.

6) Linux doesn’t crash if you accidentally pulled out your USB key/pen drive. Try this a 100 times if you don’t believe me :) but don’t blame me if your pen drive data gets corrupt.

Who pulls in and out their USB stick 100 times anyway? Also, I doubt that will cause Windows to crash.

7) Linux doesn’t require frequent re-installation: In Windows if the OS crashes, there is no easy way to recover this. Many IT support staff don’t know what to do and all they can do is re-install Windows. Which means that users applications and preferences are lost, and needs to be installed again. I haven’t seen anyone using Linux, requiring to re-install unless there is a hard drive failure. Most things in Linux can be fixed without requiring re-installation.

Just because a Windows system crashes, it doesn’t necessarily mean that recovery is impossible. In fact, it’s often possible to recover from a crash without having to reinstall the entire operating system.

The fact that you may not have heard of Linux users reinstalling their operating system doesn’t mean it never happens. If you were to ask on a popular Linux forum, you would likely find that some users have indeed had to reinstall their Linux OS at some point.

8) You can keep your operating system from your data, its designed to actually do that very easily. The benefit of this is all the users preferences can be preserved even if the OS needs to be re-installed. This can be handled by creating a separate partition for the home directory, read more.

While it’s impossible to completely isolate an operating system from user data, both Windows and Linux offer various methods to achieve a high level of separation, effectively minimizing the OS’s access to sensitive information.

On Windows 7, you can move user profiles (their account data) to another drive (Look here: http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/124198-user-profiles-create-move-during-windows-7-installation.html).

9) Linux also doesn’t require rebooting when a new hardware device is added configured.

Unless you have a computer that supports hot-swapable hardware, you would have to shut down your computer to add the new hardware anyway. Configuring new devices on Windows usually do not require restarts anymore.

10) Linux doesn’t require rebooting when you change any setting or re-configure your Network.

The only times I can recall having to reboot Windows from making a network change is when either I  1) changed the work-group the computer is in   and   2) When I add a static IPv6 address to a network device. Not really a big deal.

———————

Well this is the end of Part 1!  Click here for Part 2!


Posted in Internet and Servers, Operating Systems

Difference Between Residential and Business Internet

You may not have realized it, but Internet Service Providers (ISPs) usually offer both residential and business Internet plans for customers. For the typical Internet user, residential plans should suffice. However, for business people, server enthusiasts (people who like running their own Internet servers), film makers, and people who download a lot (ie. Netflix or YouTube), a business plan would be more appealing.

I am going to give you typical benefits of both residential and business ISP plans. Please note that these are just generalities. Your ISP may differ with the way they run their business.

Residential Internet Plans  –  Benefits

  1. You usually get faster download and upload speeds for a lower price than a business plan.
  2. Save money with lower prices.
  3. With faster Internet speeds, technically more household members can be using the Internet at once before a major slowdown happens (not always true though).

Business Internet Plans  –  Benefits

  1. Should be allowed to run your own Internet server (self-hosting, when done in the right conditions, is better than paying someone else to host your websites   Think: Who would value your website data more…the web-hosting company…or you?).
  2. Should not have any bandwidth limit per month (great for running servers and watching many online videos; don’t have to worry about going over some bandwidth limit per month and possibly getting disconnected!).
  3. Should get faster/better technical service when you have trouble.
  4. Should get free repair work done on your line (if it is not too extensive).
  5. Should be allowed to purchase a static IP address (a MUST if you want to host your own e-mail server or DNS server!).
  6. Should be allowed to run a VPN between two or more networks (you might be allowed to do one or more VPN(s) on a residential Internet plan, but I have never tried).

Summary

Basically if you want just cheap and fast, a residential Internet plan should do fine for you.

However, if you are running a business (offline or online), want to host your own server, want a static IP, and/or want a very high (or no) bandwidth limit per month, a business Internet plan should be want you want.


Posted in Internet and Servers

Top 10 Uses for Linux

Many people use Linux daily for their servers and cell phones (Android), and a few desktops as well. While many people suggest to use Linux over other operating systems (mainly Windows) for silly reasons like Linux being “more secure” or “more stable” than Windows, I will give the top ten uses for Linux (my opinions, of course).

  1. You can modify the Linux kernel to your specifications.
  2. Run Linux on several different CPU architectures.
  3. Run Linux on small devices (e.g., Raspberry Pi).
  4. Using a variety of free software (most software for Linux is free).
  5. Running web services (like web or e-mail).
  6. Running Linux on very old, out-dated hardware.
  7. Running Linux for cell phones (Android).
  8. Media entertainment
  9. Radio broadcasting
  10. Playing with embedded devices (for things such as robots and micro-controllers)

Posted in Computers, Internet and Servers, Operating Systems, Software